Click Here for 14th Finance Commission report on 7th CPC
Refer page no 240 to 250 of the report
Refer page no 240 to 250 of the report
17.24 Technically, the
recommendations of a Central Pay Commission are only for Central
Government employees and States are not bound to follow suit. Indeed, up
to the 1980s, States constituted their own Pay Commissions and
prescribed their own pay scales, based upon their fiscal capacity.
However, since the Fifth Central Pay Commission, salaries and allowances
in States have tended to converge with those in the Union Government
and since the Sixth Central Pay Commission, almost all States have
adopted the Union pattern of pay scales, albeit with modifications.
17.27 Our concern is the likely impact on overall budgetary
resources, particularly of the States, once the recommendations of the
Seventh Central Pay Commission are announced and adopted by the Union
Government. All States have asked us to provide a cushion for the pay
revision likely during our award period. The Union Government's memorandum has built, in its forecast, the implications of a pay increase from 2016-17 onwards. recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission are likely to be made only by August 2015, and
unlike the previous Finance Commissions, we would not have the benefit
of having any material to base our assessments and projections and to
specifically take the impact into account. We have, therefore, adopted
the principle of overall sustainability based on past trends, which
should realistically capture the overall fiscal needs of the States.
17.28 In our view, on matters that impact the finances of both the
Union and States, policies ought to evolve through consultations between
the States and the Union. This is especially relevant in the
determination of pay and allowances, where a part of the government
itself, in the form of the employees, is a stakeholder and influential
in policy making. A national view, arrived at through this process,
will open avenues for the Union and States to make collective efforts to
raise the extra resources required by their commitment to a pay
revision. More importantly, it would enable the Union and States to
ensure that there is a viable and justifiable relationship between the
demands on fiscal resources on account of salaries and contributions to
output by employees commensurate with expenditure incurred. In this
regard, we reiterate the views of the FC-XI for a consultative mechanism
between the Union and States, through a forum such as the Inter-State
Council, to evolve a national policy for salaries and emoluments.
17.29 Further,we would like
to draw attention to the importance of increasing the productivity of
government employees as a part of improving outputs, outcomes and
overall quality of services relatable to public expenditures. The
Seventh Central Pay Commission, has, inter alia, been tasked with making
recommendations on this aspect. Earlier Pay Commissions had also made
several recommendations to enhance productivity and improve public
administration. Productivity per employee can be raised through the
application of technology in public service delivery and in public
assets created. Raising the skills of employees through training and
capacity building also has a positive impact on productivity. The use of
appropriate technology and associated skill development require
incentives for employees to raise their individual productivities. A Pay
Commission's first task, therefore, would be to identify the right mix
of technology and skills for different categories of employees. The next
step would be to design suitable financial incentives linked to
measurable performance. We
recommend the linking of pay with productivity, with a simultaneous
focus on technology, skills and incentives. Further, we recommend that
Pay Commissions be designated as 'Pay and Productivity Commissions',with
a clear mandate to recommend measures to improve 'productivity of an
employee', in conjunction with pay revisions. We urge that, in future,
additional remuneration be linked to increase in productivity.
Pensions
17.30 Pensions have been growing steadily, and the liability for
pension payments is likely to cast a very heavy burden on budgets in the
coming years. Some of the factors contributing to this growth are: (i)
the rise in pensions recommended by successive Pay Commissions; (ii)
removal of the distinction between people retiring at different points
of time, so that all pensioners are treated alike in their pension
rights; (iii) taking over the liability for pensions of retired
employees of aided institutions and local bodies; and (iv) increasing
longevity. The New Pension Scheme (NPS), a contribution-based scheme
introduced by the Union Government in 2004 for all new recruits after
the cut-off date, has now been adopted by all States, with the exception
of West Bengal and Tripura. This scheme has the merit of transferring
future liabilities to the New Pension Fund and factoring the current
liability on a State's contribution from its current revenues. We urge
States which have not adopted the New Pension Scheme so far to
immediately consider doing so for their new recruits in order to reduce
their future burden.
Conclusion: - The recommendations of 14th Finance Commission are
important for 7th Pay Commission. As the recommendations of 14th FC is
applicable with effect from 01.04.2015 the impact of above mentioned
recommendations will be the part of 7th CPC. Need not to say that 7th
CPC has the challenge to prepare the report in stipulated time including
the views of 14th FC.
No comments:
Post a Comment